{"id":552,"date":"2017-01-19T14:15:18","date_gmt":"2017-01-19T20:15:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/law.lsu.edu\/energylaw\/?page_id=552"},"modified":"2020-01-24T13:22:49","modified_gmt":"2020-01-24T19:22:49","slug":"climate-change-law-policy-project","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/law.lsu.edu\/energylaw\/climate-change-law-policy-project\/","title":{"rendered":"Climate Change Law and Policy Project"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>Climate Change Law and Policy Project<\/h1>\n<h3>Produced by Prof. Edward Richards, <a href=\"https:\/\/sites.law.lsu.edu\/coast\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Visit the project&#8217;s website<\/a><\/h3>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-559\" src=\"https:\/\/law.lsu.edu\/energylaw\/files\/2017\/01\/Coast-and-Climate.png\" alt=\"Photos of the Louisiana Coast\" width=\"600\" height=\"408\" srcset=\"https:\/\/law.lsu.edu\/energylaw\/files\/2017\/01\/Coast-and-Climate.png 931w, https:\/\/law.lsu.edu\/energylaw\/files\/2017\/01\/Coast-and-Climate-300x204.png 300w, https:\/\/law.lsu.edu\/energylaw\/files\/2017\/01\/Coast-and-Climate-768x522.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/p>\n\n\t\t<style type='text\/css'>\n\t\t.law_rss_title h2 {\n\t\t\tfont-size: 24px !important;\n\t\t}\n\t\t.law_rss_title h2 a {\n\t\t\tcolor: #000;\n\t\t}\n\t\t.law_rss_date {\n\t\t\tcolor: #666;\n\t\t\tfont-style: italic;\n\t\t}\n\t\t.law_rss_item {\n\t\t\tborder-bottom: 2px solid #4F4F4F;\n\t\t\tmargin-bottom: 20px;\n\t\t}\n\t\t.law_rss_content img {\n\t\t\tmax-width: 80%;\n\t\t\theight: auto !important;\n\t\t}\n\t\t.law_rss_readmore {\n\t\t\tbackground: #444 none repeat scroll 0 0;\n\t\t\tborder: 1px solid #222 !important;\n\t\t\tborder-radius: 6px;\n\t\t\tbox-shadow: 1px 1px 0 #eee;\n\t\t\tcolor: #eee !important;\n\t\t\tdisplay: inline-block;\n\t\t\tfont-size: 13px;\n\t\t\tline-height: 1.2;\n\t\t\tmargin: 1em 0;\n\t\t\tpadding: 6px 12px;\n\t\t\ttext-decoration: none;\n\t\t\ttext-shadow: 1px 1px 0 #000;\n\t\t}\n\t\t.law_rss_readmore:hover {\n\t\t\tbackground: #222 none repeat scroll 0 0;\n\t\t\tcolor: #eee;\n\t\t}\n\t\t.law_rss_link {\n\t\t\ttext-align: center;\n\t\t\tfont-weight: bold;\n\t\t\tfont-size: 18px;\n\t\t\tmargin-top 20px;\n\t\t\tmargin-bottom: 20px;\n\t\t}\n\t\t<\/style>\n\t\t<div class='law_rss_item'><div class='law_rss_title'><h2><a href='https:\/\/sites.law.lsu.edu\/coast\/2024\/09\/new-source-performance-standards-for-greenhouse-gas-emissions\/' target='_blank'>New Source Performance Standards for Greenhouse Gas Emissions<\/a><\/h2><div class='law_rss_date'>Posted on: September, 12 2024 8:39 pm<\/div><\/div><div class='law_rss_content'><p><a href=\"https:\/\/biotech.law.lsu.edu\/blog\/New-Source-Performance-Standards-for-Greenhouse-Gas-Emissions.pdf\">40 CFR Part 60 [EPA\u2013HQ\u2013OAR\u20132023\u20130072; FRL\u20138536\u201301\u2013 OAR] RIN 2060\u2013AV09: New Source Performance Standards for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From New, Modified, and Reconstructed Fossil Fuel-Fired Electric Generating Units; Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Fossil Fuel-Fired Electric Generating Units; and Repeal of the Affordable Clean Energy Rule.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>This rule was promulgated by the EPA on 9 May 2024 to avoid the 22 May 2024 Congressional Review Act trigger which would have allowed the rule to be repealed by the next Congress on a procedural fasttrack. It sets GHG standards for new and certain existing fossil fuel electric generating units. The rule is under attack by red state attorneys general and by fossil fuel companies. The primary attack is that the Clean Air Act does not give the EPA the authority to require CSS to control GHGs from electric generating units. Petitioners argue that CSS is not a proven, available, cost-effective technology as required by the CAA. (<a href=\"https:\/\/biotech.law.lsu.edu\/blog\/OPENING-BRIEF-OF-PETITIONERS-West-Va-vs-EPA.pdf\">Petitioners&#8217; brief<\/a>). EPA argues that it will be by the deadline for electric generating units to implement CSS. The case is before the DC Circuit, which has declined to enjoin the rule. The petitioners are currently seeking an injunction from the Supreme Court through its shadow docket process.<\/p><\/div><\/div><div class='law_rss_item'><div class='law_rss_title'><h2><a href='https:\/\/sites.law.lsu.edu\/coast\/2023\/10\/biden-administration-proposal-to-restructure-the-national-flood-insurance-program-2023\/' target='_blank'>Biden Administration Proposal to Restructure the National Flood Insurance Program \u2013 2023<\/a><\/h2><div class='law_rss_date'>Posted on: October, 25 2023 3:54 pm<\/div><\/div><div class='law_rss_content'><p>FEMA has proposed a major revision of the NFIP, including increasing the subsidy for low and middle-income insureds. This poses a wicked problem \u2013 without the increased subsidy, these insured will either have to go bare or move. With the subsidy, they will be encouraged to stay and if they move, someone else can move in without bearing the cost of the risk. This will further increase the incentive to move into high-risk areas, which will likely have depressed pricing. (Except for beach and riverfront properties, which tend to sell at a premium regardless of flood risk.)<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fema.gov\/flood-insurance\/rules-legislation\/congressional-reauthorization\/legislative-proposals\">https:\/\/www.fema.gov\/flood-insurance\/rules-legislation\/congressional-reauthorization\/legislative-proposals<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/biotech.law.lsu.edu\/blog\/fema_letter_sent_congressional_leadership_senate_majority_leader_schumer.pdf\">Full legislative proposal (pdf)<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In the Legislative Package Reform, the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.fema.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/documents\/fema_letter-sent-congresional-leadership_2023.pdf\">letter to Congressional leaders\u00a0<\/a>included the following four principles to outline the Administration\u2019s priorities for multi-year NFIP reauthorization:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Ensuring more Americans are covered by flood insurance by making insurance more affordable to low-and-moderate income policyholders.<\/li>\n<li>Building climate resilience by transforming the communication of risk and providing Americans with tools to manage their flood risk.<\/li>\n<li>Reducing risk, losses, and disaster suffering by strengthening local floodplain management minimum standards\u00a0and addressing extreme repetitive loss properties.<\/li>\n<li>Instituting a sound and transparent financial framework that allows the NFIP to balance affordability and fiscal soundness.<\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div><\/div><div class='law_rss_item'><div class='law_rss_title'><h2><a href='https:\/\/sites.law.lsu.edu\/coast\/2023\/08\/army-corps-of-engineers-background-information\/' target='_blank'>Army Corps of Engineers \u2013 Background Information<\/a><\/h2><div class='law_rss_date'>Posted on: August, 24 2023 8:20 pm<\/div><\/div><div class='law_rss_content'><p><\/p><a href='https:\/\/sites.law.lsu.edu\/coast\/2023\/08\/army-corps-of-engineers-background-information\/' class='law_rss_readmore' target='_blank'>Read More \u2192<\/a><\/div><\/div><div class='law_rss_item'><div class='law_rss_title'><h2><a href='https:\/\/sites.law.lsu.edu\/coast\/2023\/08\/court-recognizes-reliance-interest-in-federal-flood-control-projects\/' target='_blank'>Court Recognizes Reliance Interest in Federal Flood Control Projects<\/a><\/h2><div class='law_rss_date'>Posted on: August, 24 2023 2:03 pm<\/div><\/div><div class='law_rss_content'><p><a href=\"https:\/\/biotech.law.lsu.edu\/blog\/21-1849.OPINION.6-16-2023_2143707.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Ideker Farms, Inc. v. United States, 71 F.4th 964, 980 (Fed. Cir. 2023)<\/a>; Court of Federal Claims &#8211;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/biotech.law.lsu.edu\/blog\/document_gw_03-1.pdf\">Ideker Farms, Inc. v. United States, No. 14-183L, 2018 WL 1282417 (Fed. Cl. Mar. 13, 2018)<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px\">This case recognizes a reliance interest in flood protection from federal flood control projects, rejecting the net value analysis of <a href=\"https:\/\/sites.law.lsu.edu\/coast\/2020\/07\/court-of-claims-finds-mrgo-caused-a-taking-by-flooding\/\">St. Bernard Par. Gov&#8217;t v. United States, 887 F.3d 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2018)<\/a>. This arose on the Missouri River when the Corps changed the river management to protect endangered species. Owners of property that was worthless before the original flood control program sued when some of the property was flooded due to the change in river management. Under the net benefits test, they would not have a taking because the net value of the land was still higher. The court rejects that in favor of a sort of reliance test, saying that unless the original flood control project contemplated reflooding the land, reflooding is a taking.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p><\/div><\/div><div class='law_rss_item'><div class='law_rss_title'><h2><a href='https:\/\/sites.law.lsu.edu\/coast\/2023\/08\/louisiana-sues-the-national-flood-insurance-program\/' target='_blank'>Louisiana Sues the National Flood Insurance Program<\/a><\/h2><div class='law_rss_date'>Posted on: August, 21 2023 6:57 pm<\/div><\/div><div class='law_rss_content'><p><a href=\"https:\/\/biotech.law.lsu.edu\/blog\/20230601_docket-223-cv-01839_complaint.pdf\">Complaint &#8211; Louisiana State et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al, Docket No. 2:23-cv-01839 (E.D. La. Jun 01, 2023)<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/biotech.law.lsu.edu\/blog\/DOJ_Answer_FEMA.pdf\">Defendants\u2019 Memorandum In Opposition To Plaintiffs\u2019 Motion For Preliminary Injunction &#8211; Louisiana State et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al, Docket No. 2:23-cv-01839 (E.D. La. Jun 01, 2023)<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/biotech.law.lsu.edu\/blog\/Maurstad_declaration.pdf\">Declaration of David I. Maurstad &#8211; Explaining Risk 2.0 and laying out the factual basis for the government&#8217;s move to oppose the request for a preliminary injunction.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p><\/div><\/div><div class='law_rss_item'><div class='law_rss_title'><h2><a href='https:\/\/sites.law.lsu.edu\/coast\/2023\/07\/crs-options-for-making-the-national-flood-insurance-program-more-affordable\/' target='_blank'>CRS: Options for Making the National Flood Insurance Program More Affordable<\/a><\/h2><div class='law_rss_date'>Posted on: July, 12 2023 6:44 pm<\/div><\/div><div class='law_rss_content'><p><strong>Introduction<\/strong><br \/>\nMany Members and stakeholders have expressed concern about the perceived affordability of flood insurance premiums, concerns which have come to the fore as the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) introduces a new pricing system known as Risk Rating 2.0. This new rating system, which is designed to move all National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) policies to risk-based pricing, represents the biggest change to the way the NFIP calculates flood insurance premiums since its inception.1 Nationally, according to FEMA, in the first year 77% of policyholders will see an increase in their premiums and 23% of policyholders will see a decrease under Risk Rating 2.0. 2 These impending rate raises, which vary from $120 to $240 or more annually, have increased congressional interest in reducing the cost burden of flood insurance on policyholders.<\/p><a href='https:\/\/sites.law.lsu.edu\/coast\/2023\/07\/crs-options-for-making-the-national-flood-insurance-program-more-affordable\/' class='law_rss_readmore' target='_blank'>Read More \u2192<\/a><\/div><\/div><div class='law_rss_item'><div class='law_rss_title'><h2><a href='https:\/\/sites.law.lsu.edu\/coast\/2023\/03\/fort-st-philip-natural-diversion-and-the-destruction-of-land\/' target='_blank'>Fort St. Philip Natural Diversion and the Destruction of Land<\/a><\/h2><div class='law_rss_date'>Posted on: March, 23 2023 1:29 pm<\/div><\/div><div class='law_rss_content'><p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/biotech.law.lsu.edu\/blog\/2014-Suir-Port-St.-Phillip-crevasse-study-pictorial.pdf\">Pictorial Account and Landscape Evolution of the Crevasses near Fort St. Philip, Louisiana<\/a>\u00a0(<a href=\"https:\/\/biotech.law.lsu.edu\/blog\/Rotated-Maps-2014-Suir-Port-St.-Phillip-crevasse-study-pictorial.pdf\">Rotated Maps \u2013 Port St. Phillip crevasse study<\/a>)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/biotech.law.lsu.edu\/blog\/FINAL-Ft.-St.-Philip-factsheet.pdf\">Factsheet \u2013 Pictorial Account and Landscape Evolution of the Crevasses near Fort St. Philip, Louisiana<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This report documents how a natural diversion \u2013 a break in the river levee \u2013 lead to significant land loss, not land gain.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cQuantifying the effects of active natural and constructed crevasses is critical to the planning and success of future ecosystem restoration activities. This document provides a historical overview of landscape changes within the vicinity of the natural crevasses near Fort St. Philip, Louisiana. A significant event influencing landscape change within the Fort St. Philip study area was the breaching of the eastern levee of the Mississippi River. Initially, the river water that was diverted through these crevasse channels physically removed significant marsh areas within the study area. These initial direct impacts were succeeded by several decades of larger regional loss patterns driven by subsidence and other episodic events (e.g, hurricanes and floods), and recent localized land gains. These increases in land area are potentially the long-term results of the Fort St. Philip crevasses, and the short-term impacts of delta management activities. However, for the majority of the 1956-2008 period of analysis, the crevassing of the eastern bank of the Mississippi River levee was a loss accelerant in the Fort St. Philip area.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div><div class='law_rss_item'><div class='law_rss_title'><h2><a href='https:\/\/sites.law.lsu.edu\/coast\/2022\/11\/fha-establishes-standards-for-private-flood-insurance-for-fha-backed-mortgages\/' target='_blank'>FHA establishes standards for private flood insurance for FHA backed mortgages<\/a><\/h2><div class='law_rss_date'>Posted on: November, 28 2022 1:34 pm<\/div><\/div><div class='law_rss_content'><p><a href=\"https:\/\/biotech.law.lsu.edu\/blog\/2022-25258.pdf\">Acceptance of Private Flood Insurance for FHA-Insured Mortgages<\/a><\/p>\n<p>This final rule amends Federal Housing Administration (FHA) regulations to allow mortgagors the option to purchase private flood insurance on FHA-insured mortgages for properties located in Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs), in satisfaction of the mandatory purchase requirement of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (the FDPA). The FDPA, as amended, requires the owner of a property mapped in a SFHA, and located in a community participating in the National Flood Insurance Program, to purchase flood insurance as a condition of receiving a mortgage backed by the Government Sponsored Entities (GSEs), Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), or Federal Housing Administration (FHA). In consideration of public comments, HUD&#8217;s experience implementing the program, and HUD&#8217;s goals of aligning with the Biggert-Waters Act while mitigating risk and protecting taxpayers&#8217; funds, this final rule adopts HUD&#8217;s November 23, 2020, proposed rule with minor changes.<\/p><\/div><\/div><div class='law_rss_item'><div class='law_rss_title'><h2><a href='https:\/\/sites.law.lsu.edu\/coast\/2022\/08\/baked-in-sea-level-rise\/' target='_blank'>Baked-In Sea Level Rise<\/a><\/h2><div class='law_rss_date'>Posted on: August, 30 2022 3:00 pm<\/div><\/div><div class='law_rss_content'><p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.climate.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/styles\/full_width_620_alternate_image\/public\/2020ARC_temp_map_graph_620.jpg?itok=TeBFHFjU\" alt=\"Arctic temperature map\" \/><\/p>\n<p><\/p><a href='https:\/\/sites.law.lsu.edu\/coast\/2022\/08\/baked-in-sea-level-rise\/' class='law_rss_readmore' target='_blank'>Read More \u2192<\/a><\/div><\/div><div class='law_rss_item'><div class='law_rss_title'><h2><a href='https:\/\/sites.law.lsu.edu\/coast\/2022\/06\/beaches-and-sea-level-rise\/' target='_blank'>Beaches and Sea Level Rise<\/a><\/h2><div class='law_rss_date'>Posted on: June, 16 2022 5:27 pm<\/div><\/div><div class='law_rss_content'><h1>Videos<\/h1>\n<p class=\"title style-scope ytd-video-primary-info-renderer\"><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/FqT1g2riQ30\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Beach: A River of Sand<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/bacwP-9osVE\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Science of Waves on Water &#8211; Physics of an Ocean Wave<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/oKZmOoLp4GA\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">How Level is Sea Level?<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.pbs.org\/video\/unc-tv-presents-beaches-are-moving\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Beaches Are Moving<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The Beaches Are Moving&#8221; is a 60-minute documentary that focuses on North Carolina&#8217;s barrier islands. It describes common beach processes, as well as processes that are unique to the barrier island system.\u00a0 Produced in 1983 by UNC-TV, this documentary focuses on the work of Duke marine geologist Orrin H. Pilkey Jr.<\/p>\n<h1>Articles<\/h1>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/graphics.reuters.com\/GLOBAL-ENVIRONMENT\/SAND\/ygdpzekyavw\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Hernandez, M., S. Scarr, and K. Daigle. &#8220;The messy business of sand mining explained.&#8221; (2021).<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/biotech.law.lsu.edu\/blog\/CA-Public-Trust-Doctrine-for-Beaches.pdf\">Public Trust Guiding Principles and Action Plan: Carrying out the California Coastal Act and Public Trust Doctrine in an era of climate crisis and sea level rise (June 2022)<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/biotech.law.lsu.edu\/blog\/R46328.pdf\">Carter, Nicole T., and Eva Lipiec. Flood Risk Reduction From Natural and Nature-Based Features: Army Corps of Engineers Authorities. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2020.<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/biotech.law.lsu.edu\/blog\/Flournoy2017-Beach-Law-Cleanup-How-Sea-Level-Rise-Has-Eroded-the-Ambulatory-Boundaries-Legal-Framework.pdf\">Flournoy, A.C., 2017. Beach Law Cleanup: How Sea-Level Rise Has Eroded the Ambulatory Boundaries Legal Framework. Vt. L. Rev., 42, p.89.<\/a><\/p><\/div><\/div><div class='law_rss_item'><div class='law_rss_title'><h2><a href='https:\/\/sites.law.lsu.edu\/coast\/2022\/06\/hurricane-harvey-takings-cases\/' target='_blank'>Hurricane Harvey Takings Cases<\/a><\/h2><div class='law_rss_date'>Posted on: June, 3 2022 6:00 am<\/div><\/div><div class='law_rss_content'><div>\r\n<p>Federal Circuit finds that downstream plaintiffs can state a takings case in the downstream Hurricane Harvey flooding cases:\u00a0<\/p>\r\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/biotech.law.lsu.edu\/blog\/21-1131.OPINION.6-2-2022_1959808.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Milton v. United States, 36 F.4th 1154 (Fed. Cir. 2022)<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px\">This is based on finding a property interest in a flowage easement through the plaintiff&#8217;s property. By calling this a property interest, the Court eliminates the 702 defense from the FTCA and maybe the discretionary function defense of the FTCA, depending on whether the Court of Federal Claims finds that this meets the test of Arkansas Game and Fish for a temporary taking.<\/p>\r\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/biotech.law.lsu.edu\/blog\/In-re-Downstream-Addicks.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">In re Downstream Addicks, 147 Fed. Cl. 566 (2020), rev&#8217;d and remanded sub nom. Milton v. United States, No. 2021-1131, 2022 WL 1788793 (Fed. Cir. June 2, 2022)<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/biotech.law.lsu.edu\/blog\/In-re-Upstream-Addicks.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">In re Upstream Addicks &amp; Barker (Texas) Flood-Control Reservoirs, 146 Fed. Cl. 219 (2019)<\/a><\/p>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"wp-block-file\"><a href=\"https:\/\/biotech.law.lsu.edu\/blog\/harvery-takings-may-18-2018.pdf\">In re Upstream Addicks &amp; Barker (Texas) Flood-Control Reservoirs, No. 17-9001L, 2018 WL 2354924 (Fed. Cl. May 24, 2018)<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class='law_rss_item'><div class='law_rss_title'><h2><a href='https:\/\/sites.law.lsu.edu\/coast\/2022\/03\/coastal-home-buyers-are-ignoring-rising-flood-risks-despite-clear-warnings-and-rising-insurance-premiums\/' target='_blank'>Coastal home buyers are ignoring rising flood risks, despite clear warnings and rising insurance\u00a0premiums<\/a><\/h2><div class='law_rss_date'>Posted on: March, 26 2022 4:34 pm<\/div><\/div><div class='law_rss_content'><figure><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/453400\/original\/file-20220321-13-w076bg.PNG?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;rect=0%2C0%2C2220%2C1394&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip\" \/><figcaption>Apollo Beach, Fla., averages 3 feet above sea level, with many homes directly on the water.<br \/>\n<span class=\"attribution\"><a class=\"source\" href=\"https:\/\/earth.google.com\/studio\/\">Google Earth<\/a><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/profiles\/risa-palm-188265\">Risa Palm<\/a>, <em><a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/institutions\/georgia-state-university-957\">Georgia State University<\/a><\/em> and <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/profiles\/toby-w-bolsen-804275\">Toby W. Bolsen<\/a>, <em><a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/institutions\/georgia-state-university-957\">Georgia State University<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<p><\/p><a href='https:\/\/sites.law.lsu.edu\/coast\/2022\/03\/coastal-home-buyers-are-ignoring-rising-flood-risks-despite-clear-warnings-and-rising-insurance-premiums\/' class='law_rss_readmore' target='_blank'>Read More \u2192<\/a><\/div><\/div><div class='law_rss_link'><a href='https:\/\/sites.law.lsu.edu\/coast\/' target='_blank'>Older Posts<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Climate Change Law and Policy Project Produced by Prof. Edward Richards, Visit the project&#8217;s website<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":208,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":9,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-552","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.lsu.edu\/energylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/552","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.lsu.edu\/energylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.lsu.edu\/energylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.lsu.edu\/energylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/208"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.lsu.edu\/energylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=552"}],"version-history":[{"count":22,"href":"https:\/\/law.lsu.edu\/energylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/552\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":970,"href":"https:\/\/law.lsu.edu\/energylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/552\/revisions\/970"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.lsu.edu\/energylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=552"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}